INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONTRIBUTORS
1. Submissions to the journal should
be written in English. Contributors whose native language is not
English should have their manuscripts read by a native speaker before
submission. Contributions should be sent by email in a Microsoft
word.doc format to the Editors, Dr Rosa Alonso or Dr Marta Dahlgren to
any of the following addresses: ralonso@uvigo.es, dahlgren@uvigo.es, viajournal@uvigo.es.
2. Types of submission
The journal publishes 1) full-length articles 2) replies and rejoinders, and 3) reviews of books not more than five years old.
The articles should not exceed 25 A4 pages and the review should not be more than aprox. 4 pages long.
3. One copy of the manuscript
should be submitted (in print-out by mail, OR, preferably, by e-mail
attachment) and should be double-spaced throughout (including notes and
references). All pages should be numbered serially. Please use 12 pt
Times New Roman type letters and leave ample margins. Non-English words
should appear in italics. Please avoid boldface type, except in the
title and subdivisions of the text. Use only double quotation marks,
with the exception of translations, when single quotation marks should
be used. Examples not in English should have aligned interlinear
glosses and an idiomatic translation.
4. The contributor’s full name (given name, surname) should appear after the title in bold, followed by the affiliation (University), full address for correspondence and e-mail address.
5. An abstract
of about 150 words must be submitted, in English, with a translated
version in Spanish, German or French. If the contributor does not speak
these languages, a Spanish version will be provided by the Editors.
Reference to the literature should not appear in the abstract.
6. Keywords please
provide five keywords, avoiding general and multiple concepts. The
keywords are important for indexing purposes, and should therefore be
as accurate as possible.Keywords must be included in English and a
translated version in Spanish, German or French.
7. Footnotes are not allowed. End-notes
should be kept to an absolute minimum and be as brief as possible. They
may contain no diagrams or tables. They should be numbered
consecutively and indicated in the text by a raised number following
any punctuation marks.
8. Acknowledgements
should be presented under a separate heading at the end of the article,
before the references. Do not, therefore, include them on the title
page, as a foot- or endnote or otherwise.
9. Figures and diagrams
should be included in the text in the position where they are to
appear. It is the authors’ responsibility to present figures and
diagrams that do not exceed the margins and are reproducible.
10. Non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention (even if they occur in the abstract).
11. Citations in the text
When citing, the short citation system should be used, as indicated below:
1) When citing 3 lines or more from an author:
In general the available research does not show a clearly
defined effect of personality on SLA. One reason why this is so may be
because personality becomes a major factor only in the acquisition of
communicative competence (Ellis, 1991: 121).
2) When citing within the text:
With regard to the influence of personality on SLA, Ellis (1991:121)
concludes that “personality becomes a major factor only in the
acquisition of communicative competence”.
Ellis (1991) suggests that...
12. References
Responsibility for the accuracy of bibliographic citations lies
entirely with the authors. Incomplete bibliographies will be returned
to the author. Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is
also present in the reference list. Unpublished results and personal
communications should not be mentioned. Citation of a reference as “in
press” or “forthcoming” implies that the item has been accepted for
publication.
Please adhere to the MLA system of references, as indicated below:
12. 1 Reference to a book:
12.1.1 One author:
(a) Author
(b) Initials
(c) Year of publication
(d) Title of the book in italics
(e) Place of publication
(f) Editorial
Ellis, Rod. 1991 [1985]. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.1.2 Several authors:
(a) Author
(b) Initials
(c) And
(d) Initial
(e) Author
(f) Year of publication
(g) Title of the book in italics
(h) Place of publication
(i) Editorial
Krashen, S., R. Scarcella, and M.Long (eds). 1982. Child-Adult Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
12.1.3 Chapter in a book:
(a) Author
(b) Initial
(c) Year of publication
(d) Title of the chapter in inverted commas
(e) In
(f) Initial
(g) Author
(h) Editor
(i) Year
(j) Title of the book in italics
(k) Place of publication
(l) Editorial
Gullberg, M. 2008. “Why gestures are relevant to the multilingual lexicon”. In A. Pavlenko (ed) 2008 The Bilingual Mental Lexicon. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
12.1.4 Article in a journal:
(a) Author
(b) Initial
(c) Year of publication
(d) Title of the articled between inverted commas
(e) Title of the journal in italics
(f) (Volume)
(g) Number
(h) Dots
(i) Pages
García-Mayo, M.P. 2003. “Native vs. non-native strategies in rendering grammaticality judgments”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 47: 183-199
12.1.5 Publications by the same author:
The same norms are followed but the author is not repeated:
Jarvis, S. 2003a. “Semantic and conceptual transfer”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3: 19-21.
___. 2003b. “Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon”. Language Learning, 50: 245-309.
12.1.6 Unpublished theses and dissertations:
(a) Author
(b) Initial
(c) Year of publication
(d) Title in italics
(e) Thesis
(f) Department
(g) University
Dragiev, K. 2004. Influence of an L1 grammaticized concept on the L2 acquisition of English by Bulgarian learners. Unpublished MA thesis. Department of Linguistics, Ohio University.
13. Reviewing and Evaluating
VIAL is a peer-reviewed journal. The articles which are received are
sent to two members of the editorial advisory board to be blind
reviewed. If the reports of both referees are positive the paper is
accepted. In case one of the reports is negative, the paper is sent to
an external referee who decides on its possible publication.
If the paper is rejected by the external referee and the author
considers that it should be published, it is sent to a member of the
scientific advisory board who specializes on the topic. This figure is
known as the “author defender”and it is this member of the scientific
advisory board who takes the final decision about the publication of
the article.
| |